Comments on: Wayne O’Donoghue http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue Offending everybody since 2006 Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:16:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Bock http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-57072 Bock Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:47:36 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-57072 I refer you to <a href=http://bocktherobber.com/2008/01/police-torture-dead-boys-mother rel="nofollow">this post</a> on the victim impact statement. I refer you to this post on the victim impact statement.

]]> By: billy http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-57071 billy Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:40:12 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-57071 Ok. Just a final impartial and objective thought on the Wayne issue (at least as far as Wayne is concerned). Victim impact statements have long being a way for the victim to " get it off their chest" but have no legal standing. Yet the judge may or may not consider them in sentencing. The problem it would seem is that no element of proof is required to support the content but yet the press have he right to print whatever is said. this would seem to fly in the face of fair procedure, and I write purely from an impartial point of view. It is one thing to print the "facts" as given or accecpted in evidence and backed up with proof, it is another matter completly to print the angry and more importantly, unproven words of a victim or relation of a victim. I personally feel that reporting restrictions , in the least should be imposed on victim impact statements that more or less make further unproven or unprovable criminal allegations which were never mentioned during trial. I also feel that the matter needs a lot more debate without the heated public opinion that the press manages to stir up every now and then in high profile cases. Now Im sure Ive offended someone but cest la vie. Ok. Just a final impartial and objective thought on the Wayne issue (at least as far as Wayne is concerned). Victim impact statements have long being a way for the victim to ” get it off their chest” but have no legal standing. Yet the judge may or may not consider them in sentencing. The problem it would seem is that no element of proof is required to support the content but yet the press have he right to print whatever is said. this would seem to fly in the face of fair procedure, and I write purely from an impartial point of view. It is one thing to print the “facts” as given or accecpted in evidence and backed up with proof, it is another matter completly to print the angry and more importantly, unproven words of a victim or relation of a victim. I personally feel that reporting restrictions , in the least should be imposed on victim impact statements that more or less make further unproven or unprovable criminal allegations which were never mentioned during trial. I also feel that the matter needs a lot more debate without the heated public opinion that the press manages to stir up every now and then in high profile cases. Now Im sure Ive offended someone but cest la vie.

]]> By: Bock http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-57069 Bock Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:56:04 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-57069 All right, but read the comments policy. No personal abuse and no libellous allegations. All right, but read the comments policy. No personal abuse and no libellous allegations.

]]> By: billy http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-57066 billy Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:32:56 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-57066 I shall henceforth endevour to cease talking shite. really I was just sticking with the policy of offending everyone but I suppose you have to draw the line somewhere. Just to quote myself, if I may " For every opinion, there is an equal and opposite counter opinion". So am I back?? I shall henceforth endevour to cease talking shite. really I was just sticking with the policy of offending everyone but I suppose you have to draw the line somewhere. Just to quote myself, if I may ” For every opinion, there is an equal and opposite counter opinion”. So am I back??

]]> By: Bock http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56656 Bock Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:21:38 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56656 Billy -- Are you twelve? As you're starting to behave like a pouting child, you'll be treated like one. No more tantrums from Billy. You've just been put outside the door. Billy — Are you twelve? As you’re starting to behave like a pouting child, you’ll be treated like one.

No more tantrums from Billy. You’ve just been put outside the door.

]]> By: billy http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56655 billy Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:14:27 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56655 First personal mail was sent to me, by you. Just had a quick browse through your "sight" ha ha. seems like a huge % of the opinions are yours. Like forcing your opinion down other peoples throats do you. seems a bit homoerotic."Get a grip" says Bock. Like Wayne did on young roberts throat. As I said, no personal mail. First personal mail was sent to me, by you. Just had a quick browse through your “sight” ha ha. seems like a huge % of the opinions are yours. Like forcing your opinion down other peoples throats do you. seems a bit homoerotic.”Get a grip” says Bock. Like Wayne did on young roberts throat. As I said, no personal mail.

]]> By: Bock http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56631 Bock Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:48:27 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56631 Billy Get a grip. You sent the personal mails. I wrote back and asked you to leave comments on the site instead of sending them directly to me. Billy

Get a grip. You sent the personal mails. I wrote back and asked you to leave comments on the site instead of sending them directly to me.

]]> By: billy http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56630 billy Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:44:37 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56630 no more personal mails please. i may visit your site from time to time. no more personal mails please. i may visit your site from time to time.

]]> By: Bock http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56629 Bock Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:18:28 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56629 I see Billy. You didn't accuse anyone of murder, but you'd like Majella to torture Wayne to death? How warped is that, Billy? I see Billy. You didn’t accuse anyone of murder, but you’d like Majella to torture Wayne to death?

How warped is that, Billy?

]]> By: C'est La Craic http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56628 C'est La Craic Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:09:10 +0000 http://bocktherobber.com/2007/10/wayne-odonoghue#comment-56628 Billy, if your time is so valuable, why are you wasting it on a blog. And your comment has a certain rant like air to it. Perhaps it's because when you try to <i>stand up and be heard</i>, no one listens. Seems a good enough reason to rant to me though. Billy, if your time is so valuable, why are you wasting it on a blog. And your comment has a certain rant like air to it. Perhaps it’s because when you try to stand up and be heard, no one listens. Seems a good enough reason to rant to me though.

]]>