Comments on: Shane Geoghegan Murdered in Limerick

By: C'est La Craic

C'est La Craic — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:56:04 +0000

Fair enough. More fool me for letting him get a rise.

By: Bock

Bock — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:58:55 +0000

Let’s not contaminate this thread with any more of that guy’s nonsense. We’ll move on, if that’s ok.

By: C'est La Craic

C'est La Craic — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:34:44 +0000

The knob polisher took my advice The poor attention starved gobshite.

By: C'est La Craic

C'est La Craic — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:58:52 +0000

-Hubris
You’re a fine one to go calling other people children. Just go and read your response to my comment on your site. You sound like a fucking enfant. It’s Irish society’s fault, perhaps, but you’re part of irish society as much as anyone else.
But you know what, just to prove I’m not one of Bocks boys, I’ll violate part his comments policy;
You are a fucking tool. You’re a stuck up, small minded fuck who points the finger of blame at all and sundry without looking at himself first. Fuck you, and the horse you rode in on.
Why don’t you copy and paste that for your site, you tosser.

By: Bock

Bock — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:22:00 +0000

We’re looking at a man with serious anger problems there, in my opinion. Serious and debilitating personality problems.

Wouldn’t you love living under his roof?

By: Hubris

Hubris — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:44:55 +0000

So I won’t bother to comment in future, which I’m sure will make you happy- so you can now proceed to all gather round lil’ ol’ bock there and stroke his ego by assuring him how correct he is, and he can make some more crap up to soothe his massive and apparently wounded ego.

Goodnight kiddies – I’ll leave the sandpit all to you

By: Hubris

Hubris — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:35:49 +0000

Many of the points you mention have already been emphasised elsewhere on this site.

Oh I see – I have to read the whole of your site before I dare comment on anything – oh well thanks for the tip – I’d suggest, purely to forewarn almost every other user of the internet that might even contemplatecommenting on any of your posts, that you might consider putting a notice to that effect in future – I mean unreasonable demands should at least be announced beforehand so they might not seem totally pathetically unreasonable to anyone that might not meet your apparently stringent criteria.

What do you think old Hubris did after lecturing us?

I did it while I was ‘lecturing’ you, actually
I simply tried to raise things I thought were relevant – I was told you didn’t want to hear – so I peacefully left – so now I’m ‘lecturing’? – jesus your like a pissed of kid in a playground – ‘It’s MY ball, so I say what the rules are’ – grow the fuck up – what are ya, 12?

In a monumental act of hubris, not to mention bad manners, he lifted my piece on Brian Rossiter in its entirety and reposted it on his own site, HERE, as part of something he was writing.

I lifted all of it because I felt is was ALL worth quoting. Most people would take that as a compliment – obviously I hadn’t factored in that there was an ego like your’s to feed.
My god – are you so peeved that I dared disagree with you that you start making shit up?

The bit I lifted was linked direct to your site – It was also blockquoted on my page so as to show it was NOT my writing. I know plenty of bloggers, bock, and I happen to know you’re talking shite – I don’t need to you to teach me anything about the intarwebs Bock,

If I’m guilty of anything it is that I didn’t mention you by name in the post –

I really don’t understand your need to make shit up bock – I didn’t realise a direct link to your site was not enough and and that your ego required a name drop – I’ve linked to and conversed with many other bloggers out there – you’re the first that ever had a problem – I guess the others didn’t need their ego’s stroked in quite the same way you appear to.

I had intended to leave you alone as I had been requested, I clearly signalled that by merely replying ‘ok’ to R. Cullinane.

But for some reason you then feel you need to not only ‘get the last word in’ (which I don’t really mind – it’s your blog) but also to make false charges at the same time – which is pathetic, frankly

By: C'est La Craic

C'est La Craic — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:18:52 +0000

Have you read the disclaimer at the bottom of the post. He basicly says he doesn’t necessarily support his own views, if I understand correctly. Bit odd that but perhaps I misunderstood.
A bit of bad form there qouting the entire post. He didn’t even mention the name of the site.

By: Bock

Bock — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:58:32 +0000

What do you think old Hubris did after lecturing us? In a monumental act of hubris, not to mention bad manners, he lifted my piece on Brian Rossiter in its entirety and reposted it on his own site, HERE, as part of something he was writing. Jesus Christ, some people are very badly brought up.

By: alorah

alorah — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:07:11 +0000

Hubris, I am going to be devils advocate……you said …. the police “May” have been involved.
Yet you feel you can castigate them on a possibility? What about their
rights to be innocent til proven guilty? a bit of double standards
there perhaps?

The circumstances and events leading up to Brians stay in the
garda station are in the public domain and may well have impacted on
his health to such an extent that they may actually have been the
cause of his death… Who knows? Neither you nor society can judge
without expert witness.
However what happened to Shane is very clear. Drug dealing feuding
families shot the wrong person.
Its not fair to the memories of either of these two persons to
start comparing deaths, and its unfair to automatically implicate
anyone in a death without evidence and fair trial.