Papal Nuncio’s Sermon at Knock Shrine

 Posted by on August 22, 2012  Add comments
Aug 222012
 

If you needed proof that the Catholic hierarchy are insane, you need look no further than the text of the papal Nuncio’s speech at the Knock shrine.  That’s .right: the place where so many people damaged their eyesight a few years back, staring at the sun.

This is what Charles Brown said to his audience.  Forgive me if I jump in from time to time.

 When Blessed John Paul II came here on September 30, 1979, to celebrate Holy Mass, he began with the words: “Here I am at the goal of my journey to Ireland: the Shrine of Our Lady of Knock” and, in a certain sense, his words are true for all of us here today, as we celebrate the conclusion of the National Novena; we too have come to the goal of our journey.  We come as pilgrims to pray at the feet of Mary, the humble girl of Nazareth, the glorious Mother of God, the “Woman clothed with the sun” who appeared here in 1879 to comfort and console the Catholic people of Ireland.  The passage of time tends to make us forget what things were like in Ireland when Mary appeared.  Ireland was not yet a free and independent nation; close to a million people had suffered and died during the Great Famine thirty years previously, and in the year 1879 when Mary appeared, hunger had returned to the West of Ireland.  Huge numbers of Irish people had been forced to leave as emigrants, never to return, so much so that the population of Ireland plummeted by something like 25 per cent.  

What Archbishop Brown failed to point out was this.  People might well have been hungry in the West of Ireland, but by 1879, when the Knock people suffered their hallucinations, Cardinal Paul Cullen had been on his throne for thirty years. Installed during the end of the Famine, he was engaged in a massive construction programme, building churches, cathedrals, seminaries and convents all over Ireland.  The sums expended were truly staggering and if Cullen had decided to alleviate hunger instead of building monuments to himself and his church, he might easily have made a significant difference to the suffering of the Faithful in Mayo and elsewhere.  Maybe then they wouldn’t have turned to Voodoo for consolation.

And so it was that, in those very bad times, Mary appeared, to comfort and to console and – although she never spoke a word – to lead her people, to direct her children to the Lamb on the altar, the Lamb who was slain but who now is alive, the “Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world”.  Yes, the times in which Mary appeared here in Knock were very bad, and yet it bears noting that the century which followed the apparition would be marked by an extraordinary flourishing of the Catholic Church in Ireland, with huge numbers of vocations to the priesthood and religious life and a deep Christianisation of all aspects of society.  Such a flourishing would have seemed impossible in 1879.  But the night is often darkest before the dawn.

How right he is.  As he says himself, the century which followed the apparition would be marked by an extraordinary flourishing of the Catholic Church in Ireland, with huge numbers of vocations to the priesthood and religious life and a deep Christianisation of all aspects of society.   Now what does that tell you?  Remarkably, the virgin hasn’t seen fit to use her super powers in order to prevent war or to ease famine.  Instead, for reasons best known to herself, the BVM has always chosen to appear in front of ignorant peasants or adolescent children.  Wouldn’t a sudden, unannounced TV appearance make more sense?  More to the point, why make an appearance to people who already believe in you?  Wouldn’t it make a lot more sense to turn up on the stage of the Albert Hall?  Hey, non-believing motherfuckers, look at me!

When we reflect on Our Lady’s apparition at Knock and the historical circumstances in which it occurred, we cannot help thinking about our times and our own future.  Certainly, there are reasons for discouragement.  It seems as if every few months, a new survey is released showing, or purporting to show, that the Catholic faith is disappearing in Ireland.  We have had two decades of scandals, crimes and failures.  ‘The Church is finished!’ seems to be the cry heard everywhere.

But, my brothers and sisters, let me tell you what I have seen and heard (cf. 1 John 1:3).  Two months ago, I saw the International Eucharistic Congress in Dublin exceed everyone’s expectations, with tens of thousands of people coming to learn more about the central mystery of our faith – the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist.  One month ago today, I was in Ballyvourney in County Cork, where I had the joy of ordaining a young man to the priesthood.  The small country church was filled with people young and old; the liturgy was celebrated in a beautiful way, with music and hymns in the Irish language.  The sanctuary was packed with more than eighty good and faithful priests, many very young, some quite old, all of them there to welcome and to support their newest brother in the priesthood.   Three weeks ago, in County Mayo, I saw thousands of pilgrims climbing Croagh Patrick on Reek Sunday.  Many young people.  Many men.  Some climbing in bare feet.  I saw hundreds of people that day going to confession to the priests on the top of the mountain.  Ten days ago, I was at Clonmacnoise and I saw literally hundreds of young people kneeling in adoration in front of Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament, praying the Rosary, confessing their sins, rejoicing in the liberating love of God, and sharing the joy and excitement of being Catholic with their peers.

That, my brothers and sisters, is the future of the Church in Ireland.

Eh … no, Ted.  The Eucharistic Congress was a dismal flop, with a minuscule turnout, to the utter indifference of the Irish people.  And if you were here four decades ago, you’d have been ordaining dozens of the young Father Toms and Father Joes, not the single idealistic young man who impressed you so much.  And four decades ago, you’d have seen thousands, not hundreds, of the Faithful prostrating themselves in religious fervour.

So what is this future going to be like?  Before all else, I would say that the future needs to be authentically Catholic if there is to be a future.  We need to propose the Catholic faith in its fullness, in its beauty and in its radicality, with compassion and with conviction.  We need to be unafraid to affirm the elements of the Catholic way which secular society rejects and ridicules.

I believe that the Gospel for today’s Mass points the way for the future of the Church in Ireland.  Jesus speaks to his disciples about priorities.  He tells us not to worry about things like what we are to wear and what we are to eat, or about how much money we can amass.  He says put first things first: “Seek first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these other things will be given you as well” (Mt 6:33).  And what is this Kingdom of God proposed by Jesus?  It cannot be identified with a worldly kingdom.  As Jesus says in front of Pontius Pilate, “My Kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36).  It is a Kingdom which only reaches its fulfilment and fruition in the life of the world to come, as described in our first reading from the Book of the Apocalypse.  Only in the end, will the Kingdom be complete: “a new heaven and a new earth”, the heavenly city, the New Jerusalem.  That city – to paraphrase Pope John Paul II’s words about Knock – is the goal of our journey.  If we seek that city, that goal, that Kingdom, then everything else will be taken care of.  But that Kingdom of light and joy is not only a future reality, it is also anticipated, made real in advance, wherever Jesus Christ is truly present in our world, in the celebration and adoration of the Holy Eucharist, in the sacraments and in the love we have for one another.

As the Church in Ireland moves into the future, we need to recognise that everything the Church does is somehow related to that reality: the reality of salvation.

If Charles Brown’s predecessors had stuck to this line, we wouldn’t be where we are today.  The country wouldn’t be full of clerical abuse victims, and we’d never have placed priests on pedestals, but the reality is different, as Charlie Brown neatly avoids acknowledging.  The reality is that his predecessor, as Papal Nuncio, offered two fingers to a properly appointed commission seeking to find out about child abuse by clerics in this country.  And that snub ultimately led to our Prime Minister denouncing the Vatican in our national parliament.

Charlie would need to get real, instead of floating around in a miasma of Celtic Twilight waffle.

Pope Benedict XVI has instituted a number of initiatives designed to help the Church move into the future.  He has established an office for the New Evangelisation, which means finding new ways of presenting and communicating the ancient faith, especially in those countries like Ireland which were first given the gift of Catholic faith many centuries ago.  The Holy Father has called a Synod of Bishops, that is, a meeting of Bishops in Rome, which will take place in October of this year, in order to have Bishops from all over the world reflect on this most critical question.  And thirdly, Pope Benedict has established a “Year of Faith”, which will also begin this October, on the fiftieth anniversary of the opening of the Second Vatican Council.  Pope Benedict writes: “We want to celebrate this Year in a worthy and fruitful manner.  Reflection on the faith will have to be intensified, so as to help all believers in Christ to acquire a more conscious and vigorous adherence to the Gospel, especially at a time of profound change such as humanity is currently experiencing.  We will have the opportunity to profess our faith in the Risen Lord in our cathedrals and in the churches of the whole world; in our homes and among our families, so that everyone may feel a strong need to know better and to transmit to future generations the faith of all times” (Porta fidei, 8).

The man is in denial, and so is his boss.  They have screwed up monumentally in Ireland.  They’ve committed crimes.  They’ve assaulted children.  They’ve protected their money to the last breath in their bodies, and he’s still talking about a Year of Faith.

What would be wrong with a Year of Apologies?  A Year of Humility?  A Year of Repentance?

How about a Year of Giving Away All That They Own?

A year of being decent for a change.

The Holy Father is insistent on this point.  If we are indeed to “transmit to future generations the faith of all times,” we need to deepen our own understanding of that faith.  In calling for the Year of Faith, the Holy Father has also indicated a means for deepening our understanding of the faith.  The opening day of the Year of Faith (October 11, 2012) is not only the fiftieth anniversary of the opening of the Second Vatican Council, it is also the twentieth anniversary of the publication of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which is a magnificent summary and synthesis of the Catholic faith.  The Holy Father recommends that we study the Catechism of the Catholic Church as part of the Year of Faith.  He describes the Catechism as a means of encountering the person of Christ.  Remarkably, he writes “on page after page, we find that what is presented here is no theory, but an encounter with a Person who lives within the Church” (Porta fidei, 11).  That Person is Jesus Christ, God made man.

Here in Ireland, the recently published National Directory for Catechesis of the Bishops of Ireland, entitled Share the Good News, also recommends that Catholics “consider setting up a [study] group to look at the Catechism over a period of time”… “like a book club taking a night to discuss a particular section read beforehand” (page 74).  This is a great idea, which would have a very positive effect on the future life of the Church in Ireland.

A book club to study the catechism.  What a great idea, but I have a better one.  How about setting up a club where Catholics can read in great detail the Ryan report, the Murphy report and the Cloyne report.  Then they might come to a real understanding of the things their bishops have been up to.  After that, who’s going to complain about studying fairytales?

Brothers and sisters, the future of the Church in Ireland begins now.  We have all been revitalised in our faith by the unforgettable experience of the International Eucharistic Congress, which, pray God, has marked a turning point in the life of the Church in Ireland.  Certainly, the road ahead is not an easy one, but the road ahead for Catholics in Ireland did not look very easy in 1879 when Our Lady appeared here on that rainy evening in August.  And yet her appearance was followed by one of the most fruitful periods in the fifteen centuries of Catholicism on this Island.  Yes, brothers and sisters: “Seek first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these other things will be given you as well” (Matt 6:33).

No Charlie.  Wrong again.  The Eucharistic Congress was an embarrassing flop, and it doesn’t matter how often you repeat the mantra, the reality is that most Irish people no longer care about your cult, apart from when they need a bit of drama at a wedding or a funeral.

  19 Responses to “Papal Nuncio’s Sermon at Knock Shrine”

Comments (19)
  1.  

    Right on, bockmeister!

  2.  

    did we win any medals at the eucharistic games?

  3.  

    excellent piece!

  4.  

    http://computing.dcu.ie/~humphrys/ Looks a bit like Eoin McLove

  5.  

    Also,as a computer scientist,why is his site so shite?

  6.  

    Repeating the same old thing again and again, Catholic church is wrong and stupid, ok have we all got the message?? this blog is becoming like RTE, predictable and preaching to the converted.

  7.  

    At least the papal nuncio is willing to speak in his own name using his own identity, Cmon Bock who are ya big brave man taking swipes from the hedgerows. Man up grow a pair and lets see whoe is really Bock !!

  8.  

    By the way I completely defend your right to have any opinion you wish to hold, Its just I was brought up to believe that anyone who resorted to anon letter blogs etc were simply cowards

  9.  

    Gone all quite Bock !! mmmmmmmm silence more elequent than any words

  10.  

    Sincerest apologies Gerard, but I’ve been busy all day. I didn’t have time to personally watch out for your comments.

    Why wasn’t I notified? Heads will roll for this.

    Do you have something to say about the content of the post? If you do, please share it.

  11.  

    Gerry, On the subject of Bock’s identity, why don’t you ask the pathetic sycophant apologists in the various secret Catholic fraternities (who are secret agents loyal to a foreign state) operating in this country to reveal their identities or is it one rule for the masses and another for the God Squad?

  12.  

    Gerard, you seem to have gone very quiet. (That’s “quiet”, by the way, for your future reference). Where are you?

  13.  

    I just wish we could hear some kind of comment from the Reverend Father Fitz for guidance on this whole matter.

  14.  

    It wasn’t “hallucinations” that caused the original apparations, it was an 1870’s troll using a magic lantern.

  15.  

    there was something about a German fellow, if i remember right.

  16.  

    Gerard,

    You have not responded to any of the substantive issue – which is trait symptomatic of the Catholic leadership at the present.

    Ireland is following the pattern seen elsewhere in the world. Prosperity brings brings secularisation and individualism – look at what has happened in Brazil as it has developed economically – the Catholic population has fallen to 64% of which only 20% attend Mass regularly.

  17.  

    There is an indefinite article missing above – it should read ‘a trait’

  18.  

    The analogies–actually truths–with fairy tales correlates so well with the realities of this multinational (not semi-) state corporation.
    Remember the “Churching” of women–I don’t know, maybe it still happens in deepest darkest Inis Fail–where women, about 6 weeks or so after childbirth, had to be sort of exorcised to be allowed back to Mass? It related to a type of purification after giving birth, but also may relate to pagan beliefs about “unchurched” women being somehow attractive to fairies!

    WTF!: 1) You have an abortion–you’re dirty and cast out!
    2) You give birth-you’re impure and must be cleansed!

    Instead of Catholicism–call it Mysoginism!

    Thanks Bock!

  19.  

    …..many apologies..Misogynism… wouldn’t want to get it confused with any other competing corpos.

Leave a Reply