Feb 042013
 

UPDATE: Full report here.

_______________________________________

 

The report on the Magdalene Laundries is due to be published tomorrow and its terms of reference are extremely narrow: establish the extent of State involvement in these institutions.  It had no powers to call witnesses and no powers to demand documents.

Chaired by Senator Martin McAleese, the committee consists of representatives from a number of government departments:

  • Justice and Equality;
  • Health;
  • Environment, Community and Local Government;
  • Education and Skills;
  • Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation; and
  • Children & Youth Affairs.

Its terms of reference cover the following institutions where Catholic orders of nuns kept slaves throughout the 20th century.

Sisters of Our Lady of Charity
High Park, Drumcondra, Dublin;
Sean McDermott St/Gloucester Street, Dublin;

Congregation of the Sisters of Mercy
No. 47 Forster Street, Galway;
St Patrick’s Refuge, Crofton Road, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin;

Religious Sisters of Charity
Donnybrook, Dublin;
Peacock Lane, Cork;

Sisters of the Good Shepherd
Cork Road, Waterford;
New Ross, Wexford;
Pennywell Road, Limerick;
Sunday’s Well, Cork

Good Shepherd

Unfortunately, for reasons undisclosed, the government failed to include another slave-laundry in its remit to the inter-departmental committee, namely the Stanhope Street laundry in Dublin.  It appears that the Sisters of Charity got away with this because the laundry was officially designated as a training school even though its prisoners received no training and worked themselves to death in precisely the same way as those locked up in the other slave factories.

Even more unfortunately, the investigating committee is non-statutory.  It has no powers to compel witnesses or even to demand records and is therefore at the mercy, so to speak, of the religious orders who have a vested interest in hiding the truth about the crimes their members committed against Irish women through the decades.  In this regard, the orders have found the Data Protection Act to be a great protection.

Consequently, given the fight that the religious orders put up against the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse, which did have statutory powers, it’s hard to see how Martin McAleese will be able to produce a report with any meaning.  If the government had been serious about the Magdalene scandal, it would have commissioned an inquiry with real teeth, but instead it ran scared when it saw what the Residential Institutions Redress Board cost in compensation — all of it picked up by the State and not by the perpetrators.

Given its initial statement on the matter, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the government deliberately hobbled the committee in order to make sure that these women, whose lives were destroyed by slavery, will never have a claim against the State or against the religious orders who used and abused them.

On the other hand, Martin McAleese is a decent man and I suppose we can hope that under his chairmanship the committee will be able to expose what took place in these dreadful prisons, but that’s unlikely since the terms of reference are so narrow.

We can hope, but we shouldn’t hold our breath.

 

Magdalenes

Interim Report

Download (PDF, 242KB)

 

 

______________

Previously

Government Statement on the Magdalene Laundries.

The Magdalene Laundries

 

  5 Responses to “Magdalene Laundries Report To Be Published”

Comments (5)
  1.  

    Bock,
    I was struck by the similarity of the photo above of the laundry inmates being escorted by the Guards, and the inmates of another concentration camp being similarly “guarded”
    http://nationalpostnews.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/auschwitz-poland-holocaust.jpg?w=620&h=465
    Both are victims of a mad ideology, and their fate was merely a matter of degree.

  2.  

    The first privately run prisons in Ireland.
    For-profit prisons need prisoners.
    I am convinced that people were paid to ensure a
    steady supply of free labour.

  3.  

    Women were committed to these institutions more often than not by their own families. Sometimes the notion of “The State” or “The nuns” doing this gives the common person an absolution of guilt that I don’t think is deserved. These places existed and were used by people; government, religious, and regular people to incarcerate women, often with very little reason. A relative could vouch for them to have them released. How gut-wrenching to realize that your own family could release you, but often nobody came to do that.
    There are things in our history as Irish people that cause me to look at current events with a different lens. A case in New York, where an abused teenager took on a Hasid community and won reminded me of our Catholic abuse cases. Magdalene laundries reminds me that the undervaluing of women in our present day lives (I’m thinking of rape sentences). Much has changed but not enough.

  4.  

    Scotland has jailed abusive nuns.
    It wont happen here because the populace is still
    in cannibal mode. If one insists on inducting ones young
    into “holy communion” one deserves what one gets.
    Wake up Ireland! – culturally speaking you are a couple
    of centuries behind enlightened Europe no matter
    how modern you feel yourselves to be.
    That is fine but should you persist in tolerating
    primitive ritual things can only get worse.

  5.  

    Is there any hope for us?

    The convent in Limerick turned out Christening Gown’s, handmade by the residents, they were beautiful. I met some of the retired incarcerated souls in the 1970’s. Some told me they had no other home to go to now and “anyway, who would want us?” I have visited the mass grave, at Mt. St. Lawrence, of several orphans who died of food poisoning. In the inquest, in the early 1900’s, when they died, the nun giving testimony was asked if any of the nuns died from the poisoned meat and she said “No”.

    Will Enda Kenny say The State Apologizes? I hope so.

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)