I’m struggling to understand many things about the Ian Watkins case.
First, I struggle to understand why there isn’t a law that provides for the instant castration of anyone who rapes anyone.
Second, I struggle to understand why there isn’t a law requiring the instant extermination of anyone who sexually molests a young child.
Thirdly, I fail to see why there’s not a law requiring horrible torture of any pervert who rapes a baby.
And yet, all that Ian Watkins got was a 35-year sentence.
This pervert has been raping babies all over Europe. Babies. This piece of shit has been violating babies. Can you even begin to imagine that? Babies. What the fuck is that? Babies?
There’s something even more disturbing about the case though. Two mothers were sentenced along with Watkins for facilitating his rape of their babies.
What is wrong with these people? What exactly is missing from their DNA? Two mothers agreed to let a sex offender abuse their babies. Can you process that statement? Can you make sense of it? I can’t.
You know what? Maybe there are circumstances in the background of Ian Watkins that predisposed him to abuse children, but I don’t really care. As far as I’m concerned, the 35-year sentence he received is all very well, but really what he needs is a bullet in the back of the head to make sure no other child is ever in danger from him.
You think that’s extreme? Well, maybe, but it’s in response to a fairly extreme crime.
Raping a baby? For fucksake, just shoot the prick now and get it over with.